Silicone is often selected for medical devices because it is flexible, chemically stable, and available in tightly controlled formulations. The problem is that medical-grade silicone
Most searches for conductive silicone properties return the same two lines: “silicone plus carbon black, conducts electricity.” That is not enough to specify a part.
A silicone seal can stop liquid water and still allow oxygen, carbon dioxide, or water vapor to pass through its bulk. That apparent contradiction causes
Engineers usually consider fluorosilicone when standard silicone cannot tolerate fuel or oil. The difficulty is separating the polymer’s broad reputation from the behavior of a
Most “silicone allergy” complaints we see do not start with a doctor. They start with a customer email: a rash under a wristband, redness around
Most buyers spec “flame retardant silicone” the way they tick a box on a catalog sheet. They assume it is one material with one fixed
Most outdoor specs that reach us say “UV resistant” or “suitable for outdoor use” and stop there. No exposure geography, no service life, no test
On the bench, Silicone Shore hardness looks like a single number you drop into a spec sheet. In production, it is one of the first
Most specs treat silicone as “an insulator” — one word, one property, picked off a chart. The part passes the factory hipot test. It ships.
Teams buy “optical-grade silicone” the way they buy a clarity number off a datasheet. Transmittance over 91%, water-clear, done. The first molded lot looks perfect
Most teams spec silicone the way they pick a catalog part. They read “chemically inert,” assume it covers their fluid, and move on. The seal
Most mechanical data on silicone gets buried in encyclopedic noise — broad adjectives like “flexible” and “durable,” with no numbers and no test method behind
If you fail to submit the form, please write to us directly at [email protected]
